Challenging our public school district’s obedience of county ‘health’ ‘orders’: District and teachers’ union devolve to hypocritical duplicitous silence rather than respond to BASIC, OBVIOUS legal questions, choosing to stand with ‘just follow orders’ | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN

Challenging our public school district’s obedience of county ‘health’ ‘orders’: District and teachers’ union devolve to hypocritical duplicitous silence rather than respond to BASIC, OBVIOUS legal questions, choosing to stand with ‘just follow orders’

“The rules are simple: they lie to us, we know they’re lying, they know we know they’re lying, but they keep lying to us, and we keep pretending to believe them.” ~ Elena Gorokhova, A Mountain of Crumbs (also attributed to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn)

hypocrisy: (noun) 1. a pretense of having a virtuous character, moral or religious beliefs or principles, etc., that one does not really possess. 2. a pretense of having some desirable or publicly approved attitude.

duplicity: (noun) 1. deceitfulness in speech or conduct, as by speaking or acting in two different ways to different people concerning the same matter.

Perhaps the most helpful communication is a summary of events to the most recent article, the specific updates when they occurred, and preview of coming events (articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33).

This is my best “shot” to explain, document, and prove the “Covid” + “vaccine” narrative are Crimes Against Humanity: a 4,700-word essay I sent to ~100 teacher colleagues.

Summary (links = full documentation): The California “lockdown orders” we were all told were necessary to “flatten the curve and keep hospitals running” have lasted since March 3, 2020. The California Emergency Services Act (ESA) is derived from California Government Code 8558 (b) that requires “beyond control” hospitals to authorize emergency dictatorial orders. Because Californians never received comprehensive hospital data, our government and corporate media “leaders” are lying in omission. Because problematic “positive cases” (and here, here) were substituted for “beyond control” hospitals, our leaders lie in commission. All testimony I’ve received from ~20 medical professionals here in NorCal report all hospitals they know of have been fully within their control throughout the “pandemic.”

As a NorCal public school teacher, at the start of our school year in September 2020 I inquired to our district’s leadership and teachers’ union how their negotiated policy to “obey” county “health” “orders” is legal given the above reasonable limits to dictatorial authority. I cited our mutual Oath to “support and defend” the US and CA Constitutions. I reminded the district I merely ask them as educated professional adults to perform what we expect from all our Californian Middle School students in our State teaching standards: “Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.” (page 81).

After two requests, the district contact person responded by ignoring my questions, and that employees are required to obey “California mandates” “to protect you” under threat of being terminated. I emailed our district superintendent, school board members, my school principal and two interested teachers that we teach all high school students in our US History classes that the district’s position of “just following orders” is an illegal defense, and asked again how ESA limits are being honored.

After continued district silence, I filed three legal complaints: federal, state, and a grievance for district violation of worker safety to support apparent dictatorial and illegal policy under direct threat of employment termination, $1,000 fines per violation, and one year imprisonment under Cal. Penal Code §§ 69, 148(a)(1).

Our union (HEA) responded with support to ask the district, and to communicate privately that they wouldn’t pursue the grievance to arbitration because the working conditions were negotiated in good faith. The grievance process finished with district and union agreement the complaint didn’t qualify as a grievance.

I appealed the district’s answer to our community school board for what the district redefined as a “written complaint.” From October 2 to December 18 2020 the district was silent, despite policy promising a response within 30 days of the board’s receipt. After this December 13 reminder they were out of compliance for a response, the superintendent answered that the school board upheld the district response without comment.

I also received a “non-response” after nearly 5 months from my complaint to the US Department of Justice regarding unlimited government. My complaint to the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing complaint was fielded with a phone call response in December, with their promise to follow-up, and silence since then.

In March 2021, our NorCal public school superintendent sent all staff an email citing county deaths from COVID nearing 1,300 with 80,000 “cases.” He also asked for our professional responses to an upcoming survey. I responded with three basic questions: how many of our staff and students have died of (not with) Covid, what is the data for overall county deaths given controversy over causes of deaths, and how many staff and students have been injured by vaccines. He ignored my questions twice, which I then shared with our school’s ~100 teachers as Chair of a school Professional Learning Community (PLC) on broad educational topics directly affecting our school’s teaching and learning. A few teachers have communicated support, but our Social Science Department found no interest in this topic when I emailed them in inquiry.

Our district superintendent then answered my questions, and concluded with: “If you do not agree with the state and county guidelines or if you believe we are not following them, please pursue your questions and concerns with the appropriate agency.” I responded I would do so, and report my findings.

I followed up with 14 CA government agencies over 6 weeks, with all ignoring the question of how the limit of “beyond control” hospitals was being honored for “emergency” dictatorial authority, and CA Senator Glazer’s office stating the 60-day limit applied only to “non-safety” related orders. I hadn’t considered an American legislature would surrender forever dictatorial powers to a governor or elected officials without a time limit, as public recourse would be limited to recall (as is happening with Governor Newsom) or electing other legislators.

School district and CA government “answers” are therefore intentional lies of omission to claim they answered a question about ESA to “justify” dictatorial government while leaving out any consideration of crystal-clear letter and intent requiring that our hospitals are “beyond control.” The 14 CA government agencies claim dictatorial power to close businesses, stop social gatherings, force masking, force humans to forever remain no closer than six feet from each other, and with forever power until legislators or governor say otherwise, and while lying in commission that “emergency powers” are authorized by unreliable “positive” “cases.”

At the end of April 2021, I wrote a lengthy and fully documented report of those 14 CA government agencies’ responses, and emailed it with a cover letter to district leadership, school board members, teachers’ union leadership, our PLC members, and school teachers. The district’s Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources immediately responded with threats of disciplinary action for unspecified violations of district policies, as did my school principal. The district has yet to respond to my questions regarding their undocumented complaints as the “foundation” to their threats.

I appealed to our teachers’ union for relief (and here, here). After 4 emails and 15 days of silence from our union President and VP, I sent this email to 14 of the Board of Directors of our teachers’ union. Our President and VP then responded for a next step “to gain clarification regarding matters within our scope and discuss next steps, if any.” We Zoom-met, and our union President met with district Assistant Superintendent of HR on May 25, 2021. The district emailed me claiming my PLC report somehow “harasses or disparages” my colleagues “based on their political beliefs,” yet fails again to provide any documentation or explanation despite the union and my requests.

I filed three employee grievances for apparent contract violations, with our contract requiring my silence of proceedings. On July 8, I spoke by phone with our teachers’ union president, who reported that the district is again considering my Grievances as employee complaints, with HR Assistant Superintendent admitting failure to address my requests for the district to document and explain their complaints.

On July 9, 2021 our teachers’ union held a Zoom conference with ~100 teachers to explain the tentative agreement for work conditions for 2021 - ‘22 school year for staff, students, and families to obey “the most restrictive health measures” “ordered” by state, county or federal government. I asked the first question for our union to explain how the state has ordering authority given the strict limits of “beyond control” hospitals, with union president, VP, and another union board member responding they are still representing my question, but all legal information they’ve received is that there is no requirement to oppose ordering authority until proven in court.

My school district’s final answer to my three employee grievances came on July 21, 2021:
Teachers, staff, students and families will follow “health” “orders” because they are ordered.
“Health” “orders” are whatever is ordered. We will not respond to requests for documentation of what is ordered as “healthy,” nor even acknowledge the question was asked despite our legal obligation to explain how all policies are within the limits of the law.
If teachers ask further questions how our “health” “orders” are lawful or healthy, they will be disciplined up to termination under the “reason” that such questions “harass and/or disparage other’ political beliefs.”
On July 24 I responded to the district’s formal initiation of “disciplinary action steps” that lead to termination for unprofessional conduct by offering the district choice to finally cite their unsubstantiated complaints against me, withdraw the complaints and censorship, or face my attorney. On July 26, the district’s Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources responded in refusal to substantiate their claims of my unprofessional work; claiming “The District has provided you with the appropriate documentation that has sufficiently responded to your requests. At this time, there is no additional information that can be provided to you that has not already been provided.” Our teachers union President called me with analysis from her conversations with district leadership that the district is unwilling to look beyond their legal orders, and must be forced by court or legislative orders.

I had a productive first conversation with an America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) connected attorney, who promised to converse with her team to evaluate my case for possible lawsuit support. I have a second conversation scheduled to hopefully initiate lawsuit against my school district (and perhaps other parties).

On September 4, 2021, I reported to my ~100 teacher colleagues my best “shot” to “red pill” them about dozens of game-changing facts corporate media will never report (my published research on corporate media “reporting” lies known to be false as they were told for the many variants of the Wars on Terror). This report to teachers (at “Update 3”) makes a great essay to share with comprehensive facts of our big picture condition (and here).

On Friday September 17, our district superintendent announced the school board will address the question of mandatory student “vaccines” on Wednesday, September 22. I responded to district and teachers’ union leadership with legal notice of their prima facie-crimes, and initiated another employee Grievance for contract violation guaranteeing policies in conformance to law. My attorneys affiliated with AFLDS are watching district and union responses with professional interest, as they choose which cases are best to vigorously pursue.

On Wednesday September 22, the school board voted 5-0 to “mandate” full student “vaccination” for “Covid” (see my essay to ~100 teachers for absolute proofs for quotation marks). The public comment session for 1-minute remarks were ~15 against and ~25 for. Four parents and two employees contacted me, and I’ve initiated our organized work including informing the 3 attorneys paying full attention to these developing cases. I’m also actively engaged in three current employee Grievances, and will give our teachers’ union an ultimatum to honor our contract that all district policies be “in conformance with law” by standing with me against the district’s illegal “mandates” that violate US Codes 21 and 18, and California Government Code 8558 (b) that “emergency orders” authority requires “beyond control” local resources (hospitals in this case). CDC’s latest data seem definitive proof that California and national hospitals are well within control, just as each and every one of the ~20 local doctors, nurses, and other professionals I’ve asked have told me for 20 months.

On October 2, I sent a second email to our teachers’ union President, VP, and district Board Members arguing for their legal and Oath-sworn obligation to stand with me to force the district to explain the legality of their “health” “orders” given the above crystal-clear in letter and intent legal limits (the district’s stated position is “we just follow orders, and so will you”). Parents and employees are organizing. 3 teams of AFLDS attorneys are ready to file suit(s) if this case is considered the next best landmark case to pursue.

On October 17, 2021 I sent another Professional Learning Committee (PLC) report to district and union leaderships + Boards, and ~100 teacher colleagues with two central topics. First: HUSD refuses to address limits to state/county/district “health orders” regarding required student and teacher use of Emergency Use Authorized medical products (EUAs), despite :
Federal law Title 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) requiring EUAs be administered only and always with “option to refuse” experimental medicine.
Article 6 of the US Constitution is explicit that federal law is superior to state law/“mandates”/“orders.”
California Health and Safety Codes § 24171 to § 24176 uphold federal law that every individual: “Be given the opportunity to decide to consent or not to consent to a medical experiment without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the subject’s decision.”
The second topic of the October 17 PLC report is that our teachers’ union shared their position why “health orders” to “require” EUAs is lawful: the government is not kidnapping and forcibly injecting teachers. Yes, seriously; that’s their “legal” “justification.”

On October 21, 2021, our teachers’ union president emailed me to declare my employee grievance void that requested the district to either cite their legal authority for EUA work requirements given the limits of three definitive laws, or to downgrade “requirements for employment” to “advice.” The “reason” given was the union claims that the district doesn’t have to cite legal authority for policy because any proofs of illegal policies “do not concern violations of the CBA (Collective Bargaining Agreement)” despite the CBA stating all district policies must be “in conformance with law.” Both HEA and HUSD claim that state dictatorial “orders” are sufficient legal authority to compel obedience, and both have never addressed our mutual STATE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE for We the People to serve as a check on exactly this problem of illegal dictatorial government orders. My three subsequent communications to union President, VP, and Board were unanswered.

On October 28, 2021, HUSD responded to my last employee Grievance of policy violating California Health and Safety Codes § 24171 to § 24176 by unilaterally declaring it “an email request” of an “employee complaint” “against the legality of EUAs” that they then dismissed because we all must “follow orders.” I challenged that stand, as well as challenging district refusal to answer basic questions about “official” exemptions to EUAs.

On November 14, after a week of “official silence” from district and teachers’ union, I poked them again with questions, request to meet, and dire predictions for the public consequences to HUSD official silence beyond “just follow orders,” and HEA’s tragic-comic consent to CTA’s position that “option to refuse” experimental medical treatments allows employee termination without future ability of re-hire in public education (despite Orwellian-violations of definitive CA and federal laws that “option to refuse” means the individual is free to accept or decline experimental medical products “without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the subject’s decision.”

**

Update 1:

Nov. 7 email to Administrative Director for Covid response, HR Assistant Superintendent, teachers’ union President + VP, school principal:

Herman, Carl <>

Nov 7, 2021, 5:30 PM (7 days ago)
pastedGraphic.png
to (Director, Principal, Union President + VP, HR Assistant SuperintendentpastedGraphic.png)

Dear Colleagues who are the administrative leaders of my school, teachers’ union, and HR,

In response to all of you choosing silence to my reasonable requests for definitions of the key terms for a medical exemption, and silence to my understandable assertion of law to exercise Natural Rights, I request a meeting with (Director) and/or (Assistant Superintendent), along with a HEA representative(s) to:
Explain to me how our rights under California Health and Safety Code § 24176 that all potential EUA medical experiment participants “Be given the opportunity to decide to consent or not to consent to a medical experiment without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the subject’s decision” are being honored by HUSD/HEA requirements to use EUAs as a condition of employment.
Explain to me how HUSD citation of California Education Code § 49403 to “cooperate with the local health officer in measures necessary for the prevention and control of communicable diseases in schoolage children” justifies blind obedience to prima facie-illegal county/state “orders” that the public must use medical experiments on their bodies or be subject to $1,000 fines per violation with up to a year in jail under Cal. Penal Code §§ 69, 148(a)(1). The prima facie violation is with US Code Title 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) that requires administration of EUAs with “option to refuse” without penalty or discrimination. Title 21 is US Code governing all US food and drug policies, and under Article 6 of the US Constitution is “supreme Law” when state law contradicts federal Law.
Explain to me how HEA’s interpretation of Title 21 only forbidding employers/government from kidnapping employees at work to forcibly inject them with whatever experimental “medicines” “ordered” by government is a reasonable explanation of the letter and intent of the legal term “option to refuse” given the uncontested historical context of The Nuremberg Code to forever stop any kind of medical experiment except from fully-informed volunteers. This is the same principle of informed consent universally used for any medical experiment.
Provide me with the legal definition of “medical interactive process” (including authority given to HUSD from such process), legal definition of “personal hardship” on the reasonable accommodation form you provided, and legal definition of “medical condition.” Because HUSD is administering a process using these terms, HUSD is obviously responsible to provide definitions. HUSD’s failure to respond for four weeks and counting while I’m forced with threat of unpaid leave for failure to endure forced experimental weekly “testing” is prima facie-negligence.
HUSD cannot both cite one code to “justify” “orders,” and at the same time ignore superior federal code that demonstrates the state’s ordering authority is void.

Is ongoing silence the response you want seen and known by our community, staff, and students when a teacher points to clear and definitive laws, asserts rights given to all under three cited definitive laws, and only requests HUSD/HEA respond to reasonable questions beyond being dictated by HUSD/HEA the prima facie-illegal “just follow orders”?

You all currently choose to model education to our community’s children of obedience to dictatorial “orders” despite OBVIOUS legal violation of CA political “leadership” to conform to California Government Code 8558 (b) requiring “beyond control” hospitals to authorize emergency dictatorial orders.

You all model that our students should accept government lies for policy because accepting dictates “due to” problematic “positive cases” (and here, here) OBVIOUSLY fails to meet the limit for emergency ordering authority of “beyond control” hospitals. Can any of you defend dictatorial ordering authority given the requirement of beyond control hospitals? As a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, I have seen this type of situation posed as a question for students to discern whether a claimed “emergency government power” outside legal limits is exemplary of either a constitutional or dictatorial government. You all know the answer to this question, and where you all currently stand.

How are you all honoring our mutual Oath to “support and defend” the US and CA Constitutions of limited government?

(Director) and (Assistant Superintendent): Please respond with one of these choices:
Affirm my right to not consent to experimental medical products “without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the subject’s decision,” as protected by California Health and Safety Code § 24176, Title 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), and usual practice of informed consent.
Schedule a meeting to respond to my questions (Mon, Tue, Fri 1:15 to 2:30 or Wed 1:00 to 3:30).
Explain how HUSD EUA “health orders” are able to destroy Rights explicitly protected under the three definitive laws I cite.
You all are welcome to continue evading obvious questions we teach all our students in World History, US History and US Government classes to recognize as exemplary of limited government rather than dictatorship covered by Orwellian propaganda.

I recommend joining me to ask our county and/or state to defend their “orders” as lawful given the three cited laws. I predict 90%+ of our Hayward community will also be standing with me after the confusion clears.

Be proud where you stand, for it will be known,

**

Update 2:

After silence from Nov. 7 email, Nov. 14 email expanded to Superintendent, Board, union Board, school Admin:

Herman, Carl
12:20 PM (0 minutes ago)
pastedGraphic.png

to (Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Director of Covid Response, School Board, Teachers’ Union President + VP + Board, Principal, school Admin)

pastedGraphic.png
“National Board Certification was designed to develop, retain and recognize accomplished teachers and to generate ongoing improvement in schools nationwide. It is the most respected professional certification available in K-12 education. Created by teachers, for teachers, the National Board Standards represent a consensus among educators about what accomplished teachers should know and be able to do.” ~ National Board for Professional Teaching Standards describing my status as the “gold standard” for professional conduct

“Teachers are members of learning communities. Accomplished teachers participate actively in their learning communities to promote progress and achievement. They contribute to the effectiveness of the school by working collaboratively with other professionals on policy decisions, curriculum development, professional learning, school instructional programs, and other functions that are fundamental to the development of highly productive learning communities. They work collaboratively and creatively with families and the community, engaging them productively in the work of the school and cultivating students’ connections with the opportunities, resources, and diversity they afford.
Accomplished teachers can evaluate school progress and the allocation of school resources in light of their understanding of state and local educational objectives and their knowledge of student needs. They are knowledgeable about and can advocate for specialized school and community resources that can be engaged for their students’ benefit, and are skilled at employing such resources as needed.” ~ Foundation of National Board Certification for Teachers, Five Core Propositions (page 10)

“The rules are simple: they lie to us, we know they’re lying, they know we know they’re lying, but they keep lying to us, and we keep pretending to believe them.” ~ Elena Gorokhova, A Mountain of Crumbs (also attributed to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn)

Dear Leaders of my school, district, teachers’ union, and because “official silence” to my questions seems egregious I include HUSD Board Members, HEA Board Members, and HHS Admin for thoughtful professional consideration with invitation for conversations among yourselves:

After the 5th week of “official silence” to my reasonable requests for definitions of the key terms for a legal medical exemption, and “official silence” to my understandable requests for HUSD/HEA explanations how Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) policies are in contractual “conformance to law,” again, I request a meeting with (Director for Covid Response) and/or (Assistant Superintendent), along with a HEA representative(s) to:
Explain to me how our rights under California Health and Safety Code § 24176 that all potential EUA medical experiment participants “Be given the opportunity to decide to consent or not to consent to a medical experiment without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the subject’s decision” are being honored by HUSD/HEA requirements to use EUAs as a condition of employment.
Explain to me how HUSD citation of California Education Code § 49403 to “cooperate with the local health officer in measures necessary for the prevention and control of communicable diseases in schoolage children” justifies blind obedience to prima facie-illegal county/state “orders” that the public must use medical experiments on their bodies or be subject to $1,000 fines per violation with up to a year in jail under Cal. Penal Code §§ 69, 148(a)(1). The prima facie violation is with US Code Title 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) that requires administration of EUAs with “option to refuse” without penalty or discrimination. Title 21 is US Code governing all US food and drug policies, and under Article 6 of the US Constitution is “supreme Law” when state law contradicts federal Law.
Explain to me how HEA’s interpretation of Title 21 only forbidding employers/government from kidnapping employees at work to forcibly inject them with whatever experimental “medicines” “ordered” by government is a reasonable explanation of the letter and intent of the legal term “option to refuse” given the uncontested historical context of The Nuremberg Code to forever stop any kind of medical experiment except from fully-informed volunteers. This is the same principle of informed consent universally used for any medical experiment.
Provide me with the legal definition of “medical interactive process” (including authority given to HUSD from such process), legal definition of “personal hardship” on the reasonable accommodation form you provided, and legal definition of “medical condition.” Because HUSD is administering a process using these terms, HUSD is obviously responsible to know and provide those definitions. HUSD’s failure to respond for five weeks and counting while I’m forced with threat of unpaid leave for failure to endure forced experimental weekly “testing” is prima facie-negligence.
How are you all honoring our mutual Oath to “support and defend” the US and CA Constitutions of limited government?

Do you really conclude our community, staff, and students will interpret your silence to these specific questions while standing behind “just follow orders” and “at least employees aren’t being kidnapped and shot” are ethical to HUSD’s Vision, Mission Statement, and Core Values? Again, please correct me if I inaccurately state your positions.

Or will our community, employees, and students judge your current position as hypocritical and duplicitous to only pretend to care about “conformance to law” contractual requirement for HUSD teaching and learning, our Oath to uphold US Constitutional Rights under limited government, and basic responsibility as professional educators to engage with our most important facts and questions in light of a doubled student failure rate under the policies I question?

To be clear: I am not labeling HUSD and HEA as hypocritical nor duplicitous in their silence, but am asking how silence is not hypocrisy and duplicity given the reasonable person standard of law seems to require HUSD and HEA to respond to the above questions of three cited and definitive laws in order to be serious about “conformance to law.” Conversely, the reasonable person standard of law would seem to judge HUSD and HEA’s claims that required EUA use as a condition of employment and enrollment as lawful are hypocritical and duplicitous because HUSD and HEA “explanations” of “just follow orders” and “option to refuse” EUAs only prevents kidnapping for forced injections are taught as illegal positions in every curricula I’m aware of, including what we teach HUSD students in World History, US History, and US Government when the subject of The Nuremberg Code with its applications are addressed. If HUSD and HEA wish to avoid any judgment of hypocrisy and duplicity, please accept my request to meet to clarify my confusion that “just follow orders” is sufficient governing authority in our Constitutional Republic.

I’m insistent for these questions to be resolved because as a National Board Certified Teacher in US Government, History, and Economics with 18 years’ experience crafting and delivering ~300 policy briefs for Members of Congress, I’m absolutely professionally confident that HUSD and HEA’s current responses are prima facie-illegal. This means that because 3 definitive and superior laws seem to make EUA required use illegal, HUSD and HEA have the immediate burden of proof to explain how this “on its face” determination of illegal policy is somehow explainable. Because HUSD and HEA refuse such explanation other than illegal ones explained in the preceding paragraph, I am Oath-bound to continue my questioning and civic engagement.

My personal analysis of what HUSD and HEA are attempting to do is avoid conflict with state and county government agencies (HEA avoids conflict with CTA and NEA), even when I am willing to engage in any conflict to report back to HUSD and HEA. Because I already engaged with the most authoritative 14 CA government agencies, and received only obfuscation, avoidance, and refusal to answer these questions, that should have been enough for HUSD and HEA to stand with these questions and demand official answers under threat to withdraw support from prima facie-illegal “orders” (as we are all Oath-sworn to do). That April 2021 report I sent to HUSD, HEA, and HHS teachers is here.

Instead of standing with my questions against tragic-comic and prima facie-illegal orders proven beyond reasonable doubt by ridiculous non-answers we professional educators would fail any student for attempting, HUSD:
Censored my reporting to HHS teachers of CA government official responses to teaching and learning policies that doubled our student failure rates throughout the district in the worst harm to academic performance in district history.
Initiated progressive discipline to terminate my employment.
My personal analysis is that our community will recognize that HUSD and HEA fully knew, or at least was legally required to know, that my questions are reasonable and essential, yet chose to avoid those questions while risking our employees’ and students’ health with forced use of EUAs despite:
Over 18,000 dead Americans following experimental injections, and ~1,000,000 serious injuries as reported from official VAERS data.
Over 22,000 total adverse vaccination events from students 12 to 17-years-old, including 1,400 serious injures and 29 deaths.
PCR EUA “tests” designed from generic flu because CDC, WHO, and ~100 other leading health institutes have no isolated samples of Covid-19!
Official US flu data reduced by 99% because the PCR “Covid tests” from generic flu are all counted as Covid-19.
Manipulated death statistics in multiple categories.
Manipulated Covid counting statistics in multiple categories, including counting Covid vaccine-related deaths as “unvaccinated deaths from Covid” if death occurs within 2 weeks of receiving a vaccine.
Ongoing hypocritical maskless “leaders.”
UK public health data that 89% of Covid-19 deaths over the last month are now among the “fully vaccinated” (as that definition changes).
CDC admitting they have no record of anyone spreading Covid after recovery, which demonstrates superior natural immunity.
If anyone finds any of the cited factual claims in error and/or incomplete, please inform me.

At least HEA is supporting my Grievance over HUSD censorship, although “just follow orders and be thankful for union support against employee kidnapping for forcible experimental injections at government/employer’s will” is just a lateral move from “just follow orders, and we’ll fire you if you ask questions.”

I predict leaders in government, education unions, and media will be arrested and prosecuted for damages to force experimental injections on human beings who were/are clearly protected from force under Natural Rights, the US and CA Constitutions, federal Title 21, CA Health and Safety Code, and US Code Title 18 Section 242: DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW. If you’d like a preview on the civil side, here’s the lawsuit filed against LAUSD on November 3, 2021.

I also predict that HUSD and HEA’s current position of silence will be far more damaging to both parties than simply standing with me for truthful answers to obvious and essential questions I ask. Remember, the remedy I’ve requested since September 2020 is easy, professional, and still open:
Request county/state explanation how EUA “orders”/mandates are lawful given the 3 cited laws HUSD and HEA currently refuse to address. If county/state fail to provide reasonable written explanations, HUSD and HEA withdraw consent from these prima facie-illegal orders exactly as we are Oath-honored to do, and exactly as we herald the histories of the US Founders, Gandhi, and King.
I finally predict that the Emperor’s New Clothes moment of public discovery will come in a relative instant, with HUSD and HEA being fully known for your current positions, and with consequential judgments. Our community, employees, and students will contrast your current choices with the abundant opportunities I provided for upgrades from HUSD’s prima facie-illegal and prima facie Oath-violating “just follow orders,” and HEA’s intentional and prima facie-illegal devolution of “option to refuse without force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence” to somehow dark-magically become “firing employees with permanent prevention of re-hire in public education.” The public will conclude, I predict, that HUSD and HEA would have obeyed all the way to “vaccine passports requiring everyone shot with whatever ‘medical’ experiment ‘mandated’ by ‘leaders’ or be segregated from ‘free’ society as ‘unclean’ ‘extremists’ ‘endangering’ ‘public health’.”

I write with the highest academic integrity I’m capable, and request HUSD and HEA correction if I mis-state the positions you’ve written to me. Of course, anyone can have a different prediction of the future; I offer mine as a professional service consistent with the Oath of employment required by HUSD in order to work as a teacher that I’m sworn to deliver to all of you, and if I withdrew my consent I would be terminated for employment. Please correct me if I’m inaccurate with my interpretation of what the Oath HUSD administered to me as a condition of my employment means for me to do under the circumstances about which I write and question.

(Director for Covid Response) and (Assistant Superintendent): Please respond with one of these choices:
Affirm my right to not consent to experimental medical products “without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the subject’s decision,” as protected by California Health and Safety Code § 24176, Title 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), and usual practice of informed consent.
Schedule a meeting to respond to my questions (Mon, Tue, Fri 1:15 to 2:30 or Wed 1:00 to 3:30).
Explain how HUSD EUA “health orders” are able to destroy Rights explicitly protected under the three definitive laws I cite (including California Government Code 8558 (b) requiring “beyond control” hospitals to authorize emergency dictatorial orders).
All will see All,

Carl
**

Up next!

Without a broader breakthrough to arrest those issuing these illegal orders, all I can do is skirmish to slow dictatorial progress, or so it seems. I’m at 95% certainty that White Hats are in control behind the scenes, and will participate in a “Great Awakening” breakthrough for the public to recognize what Patriots have demonstrated for decades upon decades: the Covid lies are part of a broader Emperor’s New Clothes pattern of an ongoing illegal rogue state empire.

Stay tuned for our next episode :)

**

I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History (also credentialed in Mathematics), with all economic factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences (and here). I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.
**
Carl Herman worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu

Note: My work from 2011 to October 2017 is on Washington’s Blog, which the owner closed from Internet censorship in 2019, and here since. Work back to 2009 is censored by Examiner.com (blocked author pages: here, here). This means that some links in essays are inactive. If you’d like to see those articles, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the search box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive.

Comments

SHARE THIS ARTICLE WITH YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA